My pendulum swings from Je suis Charlie to Je ne
suis pas Charlie, and back again.
Not knowing fully or understanding what Je suis
charlie really stood for, from the get-go I proudly embraced its lapel pin
on my collar, regardless. But now I am less sure, as the distinction between freedom of
expression and freedom to be fully expresed is brought home to me. Whereas the
freedom of expression on the one hand is every human's fundamental right, the right to offend and freedom to incite
resentment or hatred on the other hand is quite another and cannot be seen being part and parcel of it. Put another way, at least, I refuse to be party to it. Whenever and wherever I am fully expressed,
in the process, I have had also to exercise my freedom of expression albeit,
without recourse to offence to any group of individuals or religion. Per se, Je
suis Charlie is fine in a broader context of 'Nous sommes humain' but I am beginning to have my doubts, whether
Je suis Jamal, Je suis Ari and Je suis Hari as concepts would sit equally well with proponents of Je suis Charlie. For many of them, the Je
Suis Jamals, Aris or Haris likely are
inconvenient half truths which at best, are worthy of lip service only. But when it goes down to the wire, 'Je suis
Charlie' trumps 'Je Suis all the rest of us,' and sometimes even 'Nous sommes Humain, I dread to think.
What makes the conception of Je Suis Charlie so special is that it is a White construct
borne out of a Western tragedy which somehow makes it more special
or vastly unique than similar manner of
crazy goings on happening elsewhere be it Niger, Nigeria, Mali, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Palestine or
Pakistan.
They say too much of a good thing can be bad for
you and freedom is no exception. In its absolutist version, such a freedom has
all the trappings of wide spread anarchy in society, like we never knew existed.
Freedom comes with responsibility and right now, Charlie Hebdo is being
irresponsible period by bringing to Life - Arabic and Turkish editions knowing
full well how offensive it is to people of the Islamic faith and that these governments will not tolerate their circulation in the Mideast
and Turkey. In many ways, the Je Suis Charlies and Je ne suis pas Charlies ought to stop behaving like a child with a broken toy that cannot be mended. There are no victors here. Au contraire, meaningful engagement between the opposing camps can be the only victor.
Elasticity of thoughts, thinking and permissiveness is a good thing to have in public discourse but elasticity too comes with limits. Whatever for did physicists come up with Y: Young's modulus of elasticity?! Imagine chatting up a Charlie, thus: Did you hear the one about French law
enforcement and why they took the time they did to nab the terrorists near CDG?
Because they did the French thing of taking a 2 hr lunch break with appertifs
and all. Now, it's all very well to bring this up under freedom of expression cover but you know it as well as I do it is just too terribly insensitive and cruel to the families of those killed and snubs them and the French republic in the face, to the extent that their wounds
will start to smart. And where does this "je suis charlie" action lead up to?
Insensitivity, grief and hurt. Certainly, nobody but nobody's life is the better for it, I can assure you.
Expecting the 'Je Suis Humains' from among us to rally round to the rescue of the Je Suis Charlies as like it or not, we often find in life; taking the middle ground is the humaner thing to do.